15-10-2015, 09:12 AM
As I said before TT, correctly done, is always safe.
PME is a bit of a compromise. It gives the convenience of a low impedance earth terminal. Plus no need for an earth rod. The downside is that neutral faults elsewhere on the system can cause the "earth" potential to rise. If you're the only user on a PME system then the risk of a neutral fault is very low.
The object of the regs is to ensure that there's never a large potential between 2 conductors that you might touch at the same time. Hence all the equipotential bonding in a house.. In a caravan there's the nearby presence of genuine earth. Even more so in a boat. It's harder to ensure that an exported earth is close to true earth under these conditions.
If there's any doubt then TT the outbuilding etc and make sure that any exported earth such as the cable armour is kept well insulated. Which end for the RCD? At the source you could rely on an existing RCD in the CU. But if it trips it's a walk in the dark back to the house. At the destination is convenient but it doesn't protect the cable. IMO the cable can look after itself. The classic spade through cable will trip an MCB or blow a fuse on a PME system.
Cascaded RCDs? Don't do it. There's no discrimination unless the upstream one has a time delay. So when you get a trip you won't know which of them has tripped. Could be one, the other or both. Even if one is 100mA and the other 30mA they still don't discriminate, a 100mA leakage will trip whichever moves faster.
Anyway, that's my understanding and I could be wrong.
PME is a bit of a compromise. It gives the convenience of a low impedance earth terminal. Plus no need for an earth rod. The downside is that neutral faults elsewhere on the system can cause the "earth" potential to rise. If you're the only user on a PME system then the risk of a neutral fault is very low.
The object of the regs is to ensure that there's never a large potential between 2 conductors that you might touch at the same time. Hence all the equipotential bonding in a house.. In a caravan there's the nearby presence of genuine earth. Even more so in a boat. It's harder to ensure that an exported earth is close to true earth under these conditions.
If there's any doubt then TT the outbuilding etc and make sure that any exported earth such as the cable armour is kept well insulated. Which end for the RCD? At the source you could rely on an existing RCD in the CU. But if it trips it's a walk in the dark back to the house. At the destination is convenient but it doesn't protect the cable. IMO the cable can look after itself. The classic spade through cable will trip an MCB or blow a fuse on a PME system.
Cascaded RCDs? Don't do it. There's no discrimination unless the upstream one has a time delay. So when you get a trip you won't know which of them has tripped. Could be one, the other or both. Even if one is 100mA and the other 30mA they still don't discriminate, a 100mA leakage will trip whichever moves faster.
Anyway, that's my understanding and I could be wrong.
www.borinsky.co.uk Jeffrey Borinsky www.becg.tv







