24-06-2021, 01:39 PM
Again I think we are looking at this from the comfort of a time of peace. A time when each aircraft accident is analysed in the most minute detail, resulting in the incredibly good record of safety in aviation. War didn't allow such luxuries. The kit had to be good enough so we didn't lose too many people through malfunction, though how you define "too many" is difficult.
In Bomber Command, the prospects for flight crew weren't too good. A huge number died due to enemy action. A lot more survived in POW camps. I wonder what fraction died due to mechanical failure*. My guess is that it was small.
*As against failure due to designs that could have been improved to make the aircraft more resistant to enemy action. For example the RAF's poor specification for bullet resistant petrol tanks.
In Bomber Command, the prospects for flight crew weren't too good. A huge number died due to enemy action. A lot more survived in POW camps. I wonder what fraction died due to mechanical failure*. My guess is that it was small.
*As against failure due to designs that could have been improved to make the aircraft more resistant to enemy action. For example the RAF's poor specification for bullet resistant petrol tanks.
www.borinsky.co.uk Jeffrey Borinsky www.becg.tv







