|
Pam 500 information requested
|
|
22-06-2017, 05:10 PM
That sounds like a typical Pye approach. As with the UK's first transistor radio, test the unproven technology on a secondary brand without risking Pye's reputation.
www.borinsky.co.uk Jeffrey Borinsky www.becg.tv
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Pam 500 information requested - by Pat Pending - 22-06-2017, 10:03 AM
RE: Pam 500 information requested - by ppppenguin - 22-06-2017, 10:26 AM
RE: Pam 500 information requested - by Pat Pending - 22-06-2017, 10:35 AM
RE: Pam 500 information requested - by Terry - 22-06-2017, 11:41 AM
RE: Pam 500 information requested - by Pat Pending - 24-06-2017, 10:59 AM
RE: Pam 500 information requested - by Pat Pending - 22-06-2017, 01:16 PM
RE: Pam 500 information requested - by Pat Pending - 22-06-2017, 05:05 PM
RE: Pam 500 information requested - by ppppenguin - 22-06-2017, 05:10 PM
RE: Pam 500 information requested - by pamphonica - 23-06-2017, 05:48 PM
RE: Pam 500 information requested - by Pat Pending - 23-06-2017, 07:22 PM
|
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |
