Why did 405 look so good?

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Why did 405 look so good?

ppppenguin

Senior Engineer in Charge

Posts: 7,595
Reputation: 26
Location: London N12

#52

19-06-2017, 06:46 AM

A 2.5MHz limit on 625 lines will definitely look soft. It's under half the nominal system BW.

www.borinsky.co.uk Jeffrey Borinsky www.becg.tv

Quote

Messages In This Thread

Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 01-04-2017, 05:23 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by pwdrive - 01-04-2017, 05:33 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by ppppenguin - 01-04-2017, 05:38 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Synchrodyne - 03-04-2017, 03:30 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by peter scott - 01-04-2017, 05:55 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by peter scott - 01-04-2017, 06:17 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Refugee - 01-04-2017, 09:44 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 02-04-2017, 09:54 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Synchrodyne - 03-04-2017, 03:04 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 02-04-2017, 09:49 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Terry - 02-04-2017, 10:16 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Crackle - 02-04-2017, 10:49 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 02-04-2017, 11:55 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Terry - 02-04-2017, 10:55 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by ppppenguin - 02-04-2017, 11:35 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Hartley118 - 03-04-2017, 08:09 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 03-04-2017, 08:32 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 03-04-2017, 09:00 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Mark Hennessy - 03-04-2017, 11:40 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Mark Hennessy - 03-04-2017, 05:27 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by ppppenguin - 03-04-2017, 12:33 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Mark Hennessy - 03-04-2017, 02:33 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 03-04-2017, 04:09 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 03-04-2017, 04:19 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 03-04-2017, 04:26 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 03-04-2017, 06:02 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Terry - 03-04-2017, 08:35 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 03-04-2017, 06:09 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 03-04-2017, 08:36 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Synchrodyne - 04-04-2017, 02:41 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by ppppenguin - 04-04-2017, 05:56 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Refugee - 04-04-2017, 08:45 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Mark Hennessy - 04-04-2017, 09:17 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 04-04-2017, 02:46 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 04-04-2017, 06:46 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Geordie McBoyne - 04-04-2017, 08:21 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 04-04-2017, 08:53 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 04-04-2017, 10:47 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 05-04-2017, 08:07 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 05-04-2017, 09:36 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Terry - 06-04-2017, 09:10 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 05-04-2017, 11:07 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by peter scott - 05-04-2017, 12:09 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 05-04-2017, 02:50 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Geordie McBoyne - 05-04-2017, 08:05 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Refugee - 06-04-2017, 11:42 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 06-04-2017, 02:10 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 18-06-2017, 06:26 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Geordie McBoyne - 18-06-2017, 09:08 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by ppppenguin - 18-06-2017, 09:21 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by peter scott - 18-06-2017, 09:55 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by ppppenguin - 19-06-2017, 06:46 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Geordie McBoyne - 19-06-2017, 08:44 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by ppppenguin - 19-06-2017, 09:19 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Hartley118 - 19-06-2017, 10:44 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Doodlebug - 19-06-2017, 12:08 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by ppppenguin - 19-06-2017, 12:53 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 19-06-2017, 10:08 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by ppppenguin - 20-06-2017, 06:18 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Synchrodyne - 21-06-2017, 05:59 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 17-05-2019, 03:39 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by `FRANK.C - 18-05-2019, 10:58 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by ppppenguin - 17-05-2019, 04:35 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 18-05-2019, 07:03 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 17-05-2019, 05:28 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Terry - 20-05-2019, 03:04 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Terry - 20-05-2019, 04:08 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by ppppenguin - 17-05-2019, 08:00 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 17-05-2019, 10:47 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Terry - 20-05-2019, 03:13 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by ppppenguin - 18-05-2019, 08:00 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 18-05-2019, 08:07 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by ppppenguin - 18-05-2019, 10:04 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 18-05-2019, 10:12 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Doodlebug - 18-05-2019, 10:27 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 18-05-2019, 11:40 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Crackle - 18-05-2019, 01:53 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Terry - 20-05-2019, 03:27 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by BusyBee - 21-05-2019, 12:36 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Terry - 21-05-2019, 03:20 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Refugee - 18-05-2019, 02:20 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 18-05-2019, 08:37 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Refugee - 18-05-2019, 09:50 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Richard_FM - 18-05-2019, 11:41 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Terry - 20-05-2019, 03:42 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Richard_FM - 20-05-2019, 10:10 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Refugee - 20-05-2019, 11:03 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by pwdrive - 20-05-2019, 01:29 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by pwdrive - 20-05-2019, 03:39 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Richard_FM - 21-05-2019, 10:23 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Terry - 22-05-2019, 09:37 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by BusyBee - 23-05-2019, 01:45 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 22-05-2019, 11:46 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Richard_FM - 22-05-2019, 12:44 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 24-06-2019, 02:41 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Terry - 24-06-2019, 05:58 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 22-05-2019, 04:19 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Geordie McBoyne - 24-06-2019, 07:54 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Mike Watterson - 30-06-2019, 04:29 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Mike Watterson - 30-06-2019, 04:17 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 23-10-2020, 04:51 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 23-10-2020, 08:26 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by colly0410 - 24-10-2020, 01:37 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by peter scott - 23-10-2020, 09:17 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Murphyv310 - 23-10-2020, 09:49 PM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by ppppenguin - 24-10-2020, 06:42 AM

RE: Why did 405 look so good? - by Geordie McBoyne - 24-10-2020, 10:21 PM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me