23-12-2016, 04:03 PM
You'll have to be more careful with your 'm's and 'M's, Dick!
I don't think one milliohm would work very well!
Assuming, of course, that you mean't 1MΩ, what is it for?
If 1µF gives a 50mS attack, reducing it by 50% halves the attack time by 50%, as you found out.
Reducing it to a third should result in an attack of ~16mS as you have also discovered.
Try just removing the resistor and see if it improves anything* or, as you demonstrated that 470nF works well, reinstate it, and try reducing the value of R12 instead? Try 10kΩ to start with or, if you have a suitable value of pot or preset handy, you could try that to investigate the available range and fit the nearest preferred value afterwards.
* Of course, if removing the resistor stops the LF problem, leave the 330nF in situ and reduce R12 to 22kΩ.
I don't think one milliohm would work very well!
Assuming, of course, that you mean't 1MΩ, what is it for?
If 1µF gives a 50mS attack, reducing it by 50% halves the attack time by 50%, as you found out.
Reducing it to a third should result in an attack of ~16mS as you have also discovered.
Try just removing the resistor and see if it improves anything* or, as you demonstrated that 470nF works well, reinstate it, and try reducing the value of R12 instead? Try 10kΩ to start with or, if you have a suitable value of pot or preset handy, you could try that to investigate the available range and fit the nearest preferred value afterwards.
* Of course, if removing the resistor stops the LF problem, leave the 330nF in situ and reduce R12 to 22kΩ.
