15-11-2016, 02:30 PM
Hi David.
The circuit I'm using is a "Ramp" generator, the reset is tied to +B for free running, the BC557 supplies constant current. Negative going sync is fed to pin 5.
All electronic standards can be resolved as can some of the electronic/mechanical hybrid standards (240/25p & 180/25p)
![[Image: IMAG0555_zpsiqipyvjd.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0555_zpsiqipyvjd.jpg)
![[Image: IMAG0554_zpsqgfd6uqy.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0554_zpsqgfd6uqy.jpg)
![[Image: IMAG0553_zpswmisoawh.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0553_zpswmisoawh.jpg)
![[Image: IMAG0552_zps1fyi201k.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0552_zps1fyi201k.jpg)
![[Image: IMAG0551_zpsye1yozsi.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0551_zpsye1yozsi.jpg)
![[Image: IMAG0550_zpskqewxjku.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0550_zpskqewxjku.jpg)
![[Image: IMAG0549_zpsrqahtq8h.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0549_zpsrqahtq8h.jpg)
![[Image: IMAG0548_zpslofblbnm.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0548_zpslofblbnm.jpg)
As can be seen there is some distortion on the lower part of the scan, more so on 25p (25Hz) than on the interlaced systems.
Also there is a problem with the stored image on 240/25p, I'll look for a suitable test card of the time.
All a bit of fun but none the less successful.
The circuit I'm using is a "Ramp" generator, the reset is tied to +B for free running, the BC557 supplies constant current. Negative going sync is fed to pin 5.
All electronic standards can be resolved as can some of the electronic/mechanical hybrid standards (240/25p & 180/25p)
![[Image: IMAG0555_zpsiqipyvjd.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0555_zpsiqipyvjd.jpg)
![[Image: IMAG0554_zpsqgfd6uqy.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0554_zpsqgfd6uqy.jpg)
![[Image: IMAG0553_zpswmisoawh.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0553_zpswmisoawh.jpg)
![[Image: IMAG0552_zps1fyi201k.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0552_zps1fyi201k.jpg)
![[Image: IMAG0551_zpsye1yozsi.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0551_zpsye1yozsi.jpg)
![[Image: IMAG0550_zpskqewxjku.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0550_zpskqewxjku.jpg)
![[Image: IMAG0549_zpsrqahtq8h.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0549_zpsrqahtq8h.jpg)
![[Image: IMAG0548_zpslofblbnm.jpg]](http://i1144.photobucket.com/albums/o497/murphyv310/IMAG0548_zpslofblbnm.jpg)
As can be seen there is some distortion on the lower part of the scan, more so on 25p (25Hz) than on the interlaced systems.
Also there is a problem with the stored image on 240/25p, I'll look for a suitable test card of the time.
All a bit of fun but none the less successful.






