15-10-2015, 09:29 AM
Assuming that the OP does return sometime, I note that all the discussion has been centred on AF117 problems whereas the OP says the missing transistor is an AF115.
Although all of these AF11x transistors share the same style of construction and the consequent problems, it would be misleading to infer that an AF117 is a replacement for an AF115.
It might work - it might not, so it is wrong to give a misleading impression.
No disrespect intended to anybody who has posted but it is easy, when discussing the AF117 series to simplify it to just AF117 in the knowledge that most people will know that what you are saying refers to others in the series as well. The problem is that the OP might not be "most" people ...
Although all of these AF11x transistors share the same style of construction and the consequent problems, it would be misleading to infer that an AF117 is a replacement for an AF115.
It might work - it might not, so it is wrong to give a misleading impression.
No disrespect intended to anybody who has posted but it is easy, when discussing the AF117 series to simplify it to just AF117 in the knowledge that most people will know that what you are saying refers to others in the series as well. The problem is that the OP might not be "most" people ...
