03-03-2017, 11:33 AM
(03-03-2017, 03:46 AM)Nowhere-Man Wrote: 4.3 would be 9 volts minus the 4.7 dropped by the 4700 load.

Excellent!
The "trap" is that people who are new to this sometimes forget that they must subtract the 4.7V from the 9V supply rail. Even when folk have had a bit of practice, they still sometimes make that mistake. Most often when they sit the exam, where the pressure gets to them. It might seem unlikely to some of us, but trust me, it happens.
So, to quickly summarise:
1. Find the base voltage.
2. This allows us to see the emitter voltage.
3. With the emitter voltage known, we know the emitter (and hence collector) current.
4. Determine the voltage dropped across the load resistor, and hence determine the collector voltage.
Job done!
Incidentally, there are many ways to bias a transistor - this is a good one, but you'll see others. One notable fact with this method is that we haven't had to use hfe or Beta in any of the calculations. Most other methods do, but because hfe is a highly untrustworthy parameter of a transistor, designs should not depend on a certain value.
This is just the DC conditions. Earlier I said:
(24-02-2017, 02:40 PM)Mark Hennessy Wrote: DC conditions first. Then add signal.
In other words, you must always bias your valve or transistor before it can amplifier the way you want. The AC signal basically "wobbles" the circuit either side of the quiescent DC condition.
We can take care of the AC stuff whenever you'd like. It's pretty simple. But for now, it's worth trying to be sure you're happy with establishing DC conditions. After all, when fault-finding, this is where we start - when someone reports a faulty amplifier, the first question I have is essentially "what's the collector voltage". So, to that end, I've attached another exercise for you. Exactly the same circuit, but different resistors, and a different supply rail. Have a look at it. It won't take more than 5 minutes to work out, providing you've understood everything we've done so far.
Well done for sticking with it. This approach - logically following a path, taking small and simple steps as we go - is the right approach for most engineering challenges, and learning this philosophy is as important as the electronics itself.
Mark







