Golborne Vintage Radio

Full Version: My Hombrew Digital Frequency Counter (C 1976!)
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
All my yesterdays!

This was the first fairly complex project that I built – a counter/timer designed by two radio amateurs, G Firth, G3MFJ, and David Pratt, G3KEP who later became Chief Examiner for the C&G Radio Amateurs Exam for many years until the RAE was made more elementary by Ofcom and dropped by C&G. The design featured in the RSGB’s Radcom magazine in March 1976. Back then, such a commercially made instrument was far outside the pocket of the average amateur, and as it was, it cost me £35.00 in components, which equates to £240 today. It had quite a high component count – 35 ICs, 33 caps, 36 resistors. It has a seven-way push button switch bank, and 5-pole 11 way rotary switch. The mains transformer had three windings of 9V, 6.3V and 250V to supply 250V HT for the nixies, +5V and -6V stabilsed for the ICs via the PSU.

I built it to satisfy the terms of the Amater Radio Licence at that time (then administered by the GPO). Your station was periodically inspected back then, and you had to demonstarate to an inspector that you had the means and the abilty to measure the frequency of any signals you transmitted. This counter satisfied that requirment. (There has been no such requirement or routine inspections by Ofcom or its predecessor, the Radiocommunications Agency for many years now).

Although the counter will measure up to 200 MHz, unusually, it was built on strip-board – not usually associated with high frequency applications. The secret was the input circuitry. The HF input circuitry was build ‘dead bug style’ with the components wired directly to each other, including the two input ICs - long since obsolete - (one - an NE529K - has a circular 10-pin base like a large transistor) with wiring as short as possible. One IC divided by ten, the other by four, so whatever the RF input, the output to the rest of the counter was divided by forty. Thus, if 200 MHz was input, by the time it was passed to the rest of the counter, it would be down to 5 MHz. A further precaution was the removal of all the unused copper tracks of the strip-board – a laborious delicate task, but it had to be done.

The counter used five small nixie tubes, but would display more than five digits of a particular frequency. For example, on one of the attached pics the counter can be seen displaying 100MHz from my Heathkit RF1-U signal generator, showing two decimal places, giving a readout of 100.00. However, if the display is switched to KHz, the counter will then display the KHz beyond the decimal point to five digits, so will read the frequency to more than just two decimal places, and would read to within 10Hz (Albeit within the limitations of accuracy of the 1 MHz crystal in the timebase).

The nixie tubes had short leads intended to be plugged into sockets rather like valve pins. Longer leads had to be soldered to 12 of the 14 pins on each tube, taking care not to fracture the glass seal by excessive heat. So, 12 soldered joints to each tube, and 12 soldered joints at the other end to each of the five boards which drive the display. That’s 120 soldered joints for the five tubes alone! Each of the five boards had 22 wire links, so that’s another 44 soldered joints per display board - 220 joints, and 46 IC pins for the three ICs on each display board - another 230 joints. Hence, just the five display boards had almost 600 soldered connections.

The ‘clock board’ has seven ICs which divide the 1MHz signal from the crystal oscillator to produce 100kHz, 10kHz, 1kHz, 100Hz, 10Hz and 1 Hz. There are another six ICs on the main control board. All in all, I estimate that there are well over 1,000 soldered connections, but as each board was built separately, it could be tested and any faults highlighted.

The underside of the chassis is quite spacious and uses several construction techniques – a tagboard and tagstrip for the power supplies as well as the ‘dead bug’ input sections in two little screened boxes made from tinplate. Above the chassis, the decade dividers and other logic is on two stripboards, and there is a switch band of five Yaxley wafers, each with 11 positions to be wired.

I housed it in an aluminium case I made. It still works fine, 38 years after I built it, so my initial outlay and the effort involved has paid dividends over the years!

Time has moved on – I later built the 1 GHz ‘PW Robin’ frequency counter by the late Mike Rowe, noted for the ‘Sussex’ valve tester, but nowadays it makes little economic sense to build this sort of stuff as they’re so cheap to buy. EG. 3 GHz 10 digit LCD readout for £90.00, EG:

http://www.wsplc.com/acatalog/FC-130_Wat...unter.html

Shop bought stuff has rather take the fun out of the hobby of amateur radio, and turned it into little more than a niche of the consumer electronics market - ‘toys for boys’. Apart from which - unless you are a home-brewer - why would you want such test gear anyway, if all your stuff is ‘out of the box’ 'plug ‘n play’? It’s a mystery!

Hope this trip 'down memory lane' is of interest.
fantastic build quality i am in awe of your skill.
speach less rob t
Hi David,

Excellent work as usual. Quite a few man hours of work here.

In general 'out of the box' and custom ASIcs and the like generally reduce the level of enjoyment and depth of understanding any newcomer gets in building these types of project. My early projects were mostly in the computing area with wire wrapped boards and just about everything made of of discrete devices (before single chip CPU's). I did however build a pretty nice FM tuner in the mid seventies - even including etching the circuit boards - used it for many years.

Alas all my pre '87 stuff was lost in that famous storm than ran across the South UK in October of that year. All my gear was in the shed and there wasn't much of anything left the morning after the storm. I remember the roof was found in a neighbours garden a few houses down the road.

Cheers, John
David: the amount of labour and sheer determination to see a project like that right through to the end is a very clear indication of your dedication & enthusiasm for the hobby that you had all those years ago: looking back to my own AmRad Yesterdays, that is something I can instantly recognise and identify with. However, I never ran to constructing anything quite so ambitious as that - and that was probably mainly due to insufficient funds! Sad {Quote: "£240 in today's money": ouch!}.
A well-built project: indeed it must be truly satisfying that all these years later it is still functional. In comparison, there must be many factory-built commercial items of electronic test equipment that have long since been scrapped on the basis that they are B.E.R.

Al.
Thanks for your kind comments Al. Looking back to that time, I'm incredulous that I ever found the time to build such stuff. I was in mid career with a demanding job, our two sons were then aged 8 and 12, so as a father and husband I had a lot of demands on my time, and money was tight. Due to the cost of the components, I got them together bit by bit, making the display boards first, then buying ICs as and when I could afford them. The transformer was the most expensive item. Two years later in 1978, I built the PW Purbeck oscilloscope and again, spread the cost over several months and saved on the project by making my own case, and it gave good service for many years. I etched the PCB to make the matching double beam adaptor and got most of the bits, but never did finish that project.

In 1988 I started making the G3TSO HF transceiver and built most of the PCBs, the VFO and digital display, then that project stalled, other priorities took over, my interest in amateur radio declined, and realistically, that project is never going to get finished, leastways, not by me.

The strange thing is, that nowadays, I'm not strapped for cash - I'm strapped for time. I'd fondly imagined that retirement is all about a life of leisure, where you can just take it easy, saunter through each day, working your down your 'do-list', ticking off all those things you said you'd get around to when you retired, until eventually, you have no backlog. Dream on! trust me, it's never going to happen, well it has yet to do so for me, and I've had 18 years at it, I've metamorphosed into one of those insufferable old buffers who are forever saying 'I don't know how I found time to go to work'. Rolleyes

Funny old world, innit?
(12-08-2012, 08:12 PM)Yorkie Wrote: [ -> ]The strange thing is, that nowadays, I'm not strapped for cash - I'm strapped for time. I'd fondly imagined that retirement is all about a life of leisure, where you can just take it easy, saunter through each day, working your down your 'do-list', ticking off all those things you said you'd get around to when you retired, until eventually, you have no backlog. Dream on! trust me, it's never going to happen, well it has yet to do so for me, and I've had 18 years at it, I've metamorphosed into one of those insufferable old buffers who are forever saying 'I don't know how I found time to go to work'. Rolleyes

I couldn't agree more. There are some mornings when I say to myself 'I wish I was at work 'cause someone else would tell me what to do instead of having to decide myself'.
However, I wouldn't want to really.

Alan
(12-08-2012, 08:12 PM)Yorkie Wrote: [ -> ]The strange thing is, that nowadays, I'm not strapped for cash - I'm strapped for time.

Yup, I know the feeling: I'm short on both fronts! Sad As for the 'time' component, our generation were brought up in a climate of 'make do and mend' - so the older we get, the more skills we acquire at mending things plus the older we get, the more things there are that seem to need our skills in mending anyway. The only mending skills that I'm seriously short of are those to mend bits of myself! Rolleyes (Thinks: eye-sight, hearing, joints & muscles, memory, etc. )

(12-08-2012, 08:12 PM)Yorkie Wrote: [ -> ]I'd fondly imagined that retirement is all about a life of leisure, where you can just take it easy, saunter through each day, working down your 'do-list', ticking off all those things you said you'd get around to when you retired, until eventually you have no backlog. Dream on! Trust me, it's never going to happen!

As I am slowly beginning to discover, having been forced into premature retirement about 3 years ago. Sad There are several large & serious 'radio' projects that are now starting to clutter up my workshop. I'm starting to realise, with each passing day, that they are slowly receding from the prospect of ever getting sorted. Sad

(12-08-2012, 08:12 PM)Yorkie Wrote: [ -> ]I've metamorphosed into one of those insufferable old buffers who are forever saying 'I don't know how I found time to go to work'. Rolleyes

Ditto.

(12-08-2012, 08:12 PM)Yorkie Wrote: [ -> ]Funny old world, innit?

Quite: I am reminded of an astute observation that Alan Beckett made some time ago: "It's the young that seem to be in such a hurry, compared to us, which is a bit strange considering that unlike us, they have plenty of time in front of them."

Yes, it's a funny ol' world, indeed.

Al.

(12-08-2012, 08:41 PM)AlanBeckett Wrote: [ -> ]There are some mornings when I say to myself "I wish I was at work 'cause someone else would tell me what to do instead of having to decide myself".
However, I wouldn't want to really.

Yes, agreed. One of the 'joys' of having regular employment is that it does give a form of structure to one's life, even if it is somewhat non-optional. In the work-place, I always took the attitude that I was a Simple Soldier: give me instructions as to what you want done and by when - now leave me to get on with it: thank you. What used to really annoy me was when that was taken a step further - being told just how to do the job - when I had previously and copiously demonstrated that I was perfectly capable of doing it - provided that I was left alone to simply get on with it. The saying of having a dog and teaching it how to bark always sprang to mind. Rolleyes

Al.



Getting old sucks.

Lawrence.
(12-08-2012, 09:09 AM)Yorkie Wrote: [ -> ]So, 12 soldered joints to each tube, and 12 soldered joints at the other end to each of the five boards which drive the display. That’s 120 soldered joints for the five tubes alone! Each of the five boards had 22 wire links, so that’s another 44 soldered joints per display board - 220 joints, and 46 IC pins for the three ICs on each display board - another 230 joints. Hence, just the five display boards had almost 600 soldered connections.

Hi David,

Obviously extreme patience and dedication to have undertook all that soldering. I bet it was all the more satisfying though when the unit was completed and it worked!

Thanks for sharing some of your early projects with us, it is really fascinating to see some of the magazine projects of the 70's actually constructed.

I was about 12 to 14 at the time of the articles you mentioned. I well remember the PW Purbeck, in fact I probably still have those issues of PW somewhere, but could only dream of affording the components on my pocket money of the time!

Regards
Pages: 1 2